In #18631 some IN notification callbacks that were doing nothing were
removed, which should be a valid thing to do (ChibiOS HAL checks the
`in_cb` and `out_cb` pointers for being non-NULL before invoking those
optional callbacks). However, it turned out that some less popular USB
LLDs (KINETIS and MIMXRT1062) have their own checks for those pointers,
and (incorrectly) skip the ChibiOS callback handling when those pointers
are NULL, which breaks the code for the `USB_USE_WAIT` configuration
option (the waiting thread never gets resumed if the corresponding
callback pointer is NULL).
Add those dummy callbacks again (but use a single function for all of
them instead of individual ones for each endpoint); this restores the
KINETIS and MIMXRT1062 boards to the working state while the LLDs are
getting fixed.
* Move Bluetooth-related function calls up to host/keyboard level
* Remove pointless set_output() call
* Move bluetooth (rn42) init to end of keyboard_init()
* Enable SPI/UART for ChibiOS targets
* Some more slight tweaks
* Add ARRAY_SIZE and CEILING utility macros
* Apply a coccinelle patch to use ARRAY_SIZE
* fix up some straggling items
* Fix 'make test:secure'
* Enhance ARRAY_SIZE macro to reject acting on pointers
The previous definition would not produce a diagnostic for
```
int *p;
size_t num_elem = ARRAY_SIZE(p)
```
but the new one will.
* explicitly get definition of ARRAY_SIZE
* Convert to ARRAY_SIZE when const is involved
The following spatch finds additional instances where the array is
const and the division is by the size of the type, not the size of
the first element:
```
@ rule5a using "empty.iso" @
type T;
const T[] E;
@@
- (sizeof(E)/sizeof(T))
+ ARRAY_SIZE(E)
@ rule6a using "empty.iso" @
type T;
const T[] E;
@@
- sizeof(E)/sizeof(T)
+ ARRAY_SIZE(E)
```
* New instances of ARRAY_SIZE added since initial spatch run
* Use `ARRAY_SIZE` in docs (found by grep)
* Manually use ARRAY_SIZE
hs_set is expected to be the same size as uint16_t, though it's made
of two 8-bit integers
* Just like char, sizeof(uint8_t) is guaranteed to be 1
This is at least true on any plausible system where qmk is actually used.
Per my understanding it's universally true, assuming that uint8_t exists:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48655310/can-i-assume-that-sizeofuint8-t-1
* Run qmk-format on core C files touched in this branch
Co-authored-by: Stefan Kerkmann <karlk90@pm.me>
