bdeshiandClaude Opus 5
64e53f28c8
Two decisions and one mechanism. The human wants demos, games and runnable
embeds to carry real CSS and JS while every ordinary page stays scriptless, and
wants adding an asset to be theme work rather than a rebuild.
The mechanism reuses what already had that property. A theme defines
`assets:<name>` beside its other fragments; shortcodes record their own name as
they are opened; after conversion the engine renders each matching fragment once
into Page.Assets. So a gallery calling one shortcode forty times carries its
stylesheet once, and a page that called nothing carries nothing. Frontmatter
`use:` reaches the same fragments without a call.
Considered and rejected: templates/assets.yaml, which reads more declaratively
and buys a parser, a contract shape and a rebuild for conditional markup; and a
table in Go mapping shortcode to files, which would hardcode exactly what was
deliberately made data-driven.
Collection is parse-phase, so no transform counter moves — goldmark's extender
list is already the ordered pipeline for parse work, which state.md's counter
says in its "does not count" column.
Separately, styles/scripts are lifted at last. They sat in content-model.md's
table unread, and the theme contract listed them under "what the engine
provides", which was aspirational rather than true. Both are bundle-relative: a
name with .. or a leading / is dropped and logged, the refusal ::include and a
code block's file= already make. The engine builds the URLs because a theme must
not construct an address.
ADR-0080 writes the antifeature list down, with its single exception inside it.
An antifeature nobody recorded does not bind anything, and each of these dies to
one reasonable-looking request at a time. The exception is author-invoked and
cannot fire by accident.
The reference theme emits the stylesheets and no script element at all. That was
the human's correction to a first attempt which had page.html emitting the tag
and verify.sh narrowed to permit it — narrowing the gate to fit the code was
backwards, and the narrowing was also wrong, passing a probe with a hardcoded src
because it filtered whole lines and every line carries {{define}}. verify.sh is
untouched. examples/demo-site redefines the head block instead, so the JavaScript
half is demonstrated by a site rather than built into the binary, which is a
better demonstration and a stronger property.
Evidence, against the demo site with a freshly built binary: the sandbox page
carries its own css and js at bundle-relative URLs; colophon calls ::tally twice
and carries tally.css once with zero scripts; about calls it never and carries
neither; listings unaffected. Plus a table test for the escape refusal, which
until now had only the running server behind it.
19 files, +355/-86. No counter moves. Demo is 31 bundles.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
khosra
A flat-file personal publishing engine in Go. Point the binary at a directory of Markdown and it becomes an owned, networked home for fiction, webcomics, art, and essays, in English and Bengali. The site's content lives in its own repository, not this one (ADR-0011).
Build and run
Needs Go 1.26+ and git; nothing else.
make build # or: go build -o khosra ./cmd/khosra
make run SITE=/path/to/site # or: ./khosra -site /path/to/site
make test
make verify # everything the project enforces — green before every commit
make help lists targets. make is a convenience wrapper; go build, go test and
./scripts/verify.sh work on their own and are what the gate uses.
A site root is a directory holding content/, and optionally static/ and templates/. It lives in its
own repository, not this one — the binary is pointed at it.
If you are a human: start at HARNESS.md — what the scaffolding is, how to use it, and what to decide.
If you are an agent: start at CLAUDE.md — the constitution and the read order. It is loaded for you automatically; this file is not a prerequisite and nothing here is a rule.