docs/content-model.md opens with "Engine specification". It is also where the rule lives that a leading underscore makes a file unaddressable — and the human who owns this site did not know that rule, because nothing in this repository is addressed to an author. Twelve documents named docs/ while being exclusively about building the parser is a signpost pointing at the wrong room. Naming the directory for its audience makes the gap visible instead of hiding it. docs/ is now reserved and deliberately absent: an empty docs/ is an honest statement that end-user documentation does not exist, where docs/ full of parser specs was a claim that it did. HARNESS.md stays at the root. Root holds the three entry points — README.md for a human, CLAUDE.md for an agent, HARNESS.md for whoever maintains the machine — and harness/README.md is the map of the directory, so moving the guide inside would have collided with it for nothing. Mechanical and wide: 100 path references across 24 files. Every verify.sh gate that names a doc by path, the directory lists the dangling-path and ADR-number gates scan, surface.sh's output target, the Makefile, CLAUDE.md's read order, the skill, four commands, and two Go package comments. A first pass with a shell loop silently edited only four files and the rest still said docs/; the fix was to write the file list out and check the remaining count was zero rather than trust the loop's exit status. No rule, threshold, gate or obligation moved — this is a rename, and the gates demonstrated it twice: they stayed green on the new paths, and the ADR-number gate caught ADR-0082 before the entry existed. Deferred, both on the human's call: the end-user documentation site itself, which wants its own decision about where it lives and whether its claims are gated; and moving examples/ under docs/, since demo-site is a live site root that verify.sh, the coverage test and make demo all point at, and moving it would couple a rename to a design nobody has made. 31 files, +146/-106. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.2 KiB
2.2 KiB
description
| description |
|---|
| Check the architecture invariants against the code, not against the docs |
verify.sh checks what a grep can check. This pass checks the nine invariants in
harness/architecture.md, which need reading the code. Run at arc boundaries, before a freeze, and
before the first deploy.
For each invariant, answer held / violated / not yet applicable, with a file and line when violated. Do not fix anything in this pass.
- Open page object — are all fields optional in practice? Find any place a missing field causes a nil deref, an error return, or a template failure that reaches the response.
- Trusted / untrusted modes — trace every path by which non-repo bytes could reach shortcode or template evaluation. This is the one invariant where "probably fine" is not an answer: name the check that stops it, or report it violated.
- Identity is not language — is the bundle key free of language? Any place a language suffix leaks into a cache key, a URL, or a dependency key is a violation.
- Request-time render behind a cache — does export walk the same code path as the server, or has a second path appeared?
- Permalinks permanent — does any code derive a URL by a rule other than the one in
content-model.md? Does every rename path emit an alias plus a permanent redirect? - Interactions off the content graph — can an interaction invalidate more than its own fragment?
- Every feature is a leaf — is each
internal/ext/*package deletable without touching the core? Try naming the diff that removes one. - Degrades with external services off — for each external client, is there a path that still serves correctly, slowly, when it is unreachable?
- Core stops growing after Arc 2 — compare the
corefigureverify.shprints against the one recorded at the freeze instate.md. Post-freeze growth is the finding, not the number.
Then: report held/violated per invariant, and for anything violated, whether it is a bug to fix now
or a latent item with a trigger. A violated invariant is a stop condition (CLAUDE.md §6) — say so
plainly rather than documenting it as the new normal.