bdeshi
53d679728d
The human asked whether widow prevention belonged in the backend at all. It did not, and it broke two rules already written down: the theme contract says the engine decides nothing about how something looks, and ADR-0034 says authored body text is the author's — while this inserted U+00A0 into that text. The practical harm follows from the layer error rather than from a coding mistake. The engine cannot see the line box, so joining the last two words is a guess that can overflow a narrow viewport, and a reader copying the paragraph gets a non-breaking space in their clipboard. `text-wrap: pretty` and `text-wrap: balance` in the reference stylesheet know the line box and need no bytes in the content. 108 lines of engine deleted for one CSS declaration. The typographer stays: turning `--` into an en dash is a text transformation no stylesheet can express, which is exactly the distinction the new layer test draws. Also worth recording: this took the Extensions counter from 3 back to 2. A threshold reached by a feature that should not have existed was never a threshold.
16 lines
789 B
CSS
16 lines
789 B
CSS
/* Reference theme: legibility only, no design opinions (ADR-0026). */
|
|
html { font-family: Georgia, serif; line-height: 1.6; color: #1a1a1a; background: #fdfdfb; }
|
|
main { max-width: 34rem; margin: 3rem auto; padding: 0 1rem; }
|
|
h1, h2, h3 { line-height: 1.25; font-weight: 600; text-wrap: balance; }
|
|
/* Line breaking belongs to the browser, which knows the line box no engine-side guess can see (ADR-0045). */
|
|
p, li, figcaption { text-wrap: pretty; }
|
|
a { color: #1a4d7a; }
|
|
img { max-width: 100%; height: auto; }
|
|
pre, code { font-family: ui-monospace, monospace; font-size: 0.9em; }
|
|
pre { overflow-x: auto; padding: 0.75rem; background: #f3f2ee; }
|
|
@media (prefers-color-scheme: dark) {
|
|
html { color: #e8e6e1; background: #16161a; }
|
|
a { color: #8ab4dd; }
|
|
pre { background: #22222a; }
|
|
}
|